This document, covering January 2025 through January 2026, details municipal payments for advertising, notices, and publications placed in the Superior Telegram and related outlets. The ledger shows a steady stream of taxpayer-funded expenditures directed primarily to Forum Communications Company and Column Software PBC. The total recorded spending reaches $19,300.50.
Who Benefits from Public Notices
Forum Communications Company appears repeatedly as a primary recipient. Column Software PBC also receives frequent payments tied to bid notices and public postings. These vendors act as gatekeepers for legally required public notices. The structure raises questions about competition and pricing.
Nature of the Transactions
Most charges fall under “Pubs, Subs, Dues,” a vague accounting label. The entries include:
-
- Public hearing notices
-
- Election announcements
-
- Bid and proposal advertisements
-
- City council meeting minutes
-
- Ordinance publications
On page 1, early January entries show routine notices such as New Year ads and infrastructure bids. By mid-year, the pattern intensifies. Page 2 reveals large spikes in May 2025, including two identical $1,546 charges for spring cleanup and brush pickup ads. These duplications invite scrutiny.
Patterns and Concerns
The spending shows no meaningful decline throughout the year. Instead, it reflects institutional dependence on paid publication channels. Many entries are small, but they accumulate quickly. Weekly charges for meeting minutes and ordinance notices create a predictable revenue stream for publishers.
The ledger also suggests limited oversight. Descriptions remain brief and repetitive. Some entries lack clear justification beyond compliance language. The reliance on external publication services persists even as digital alternatives exist.
Follow-Up and Implications
No evidence in the document indicates cost review, vendor comparison, or efficiency measures. The absence of competitive bidding for publication services stands out. Taxpayers fund these notices, yet the process appears routine and unquestioned.
Future inquiry should examine whether the city explored lower-cost digital publication options. Officials should also review whether statutory notice requirements justify current spending levels. Transparency demands more than compliance; it requires scrutiny of recurring expenses that quietly drain public funds.
https://www.superiortelegram.com
FEDERAL COURT – Brady Status Email – LeRette Case
This FOIA record contains a May 16, 2025 email from Kate Harrell to Mikayla LeRette, Robert Powell, and Richard Gondik. The subject is “Re: Brady Consideration.” The email discusses whether Douglas County District Attorney Mark Fruehauf had made a Brady or Giglio determination about LeRette. The thread follows LeRette’s May 15, 2025 message. She asked for clarity about what the district attorney needed before clearing
SPD Decoder Ring: Leadership Swaps That Lawyers Love
Federal Court Is a Soap Opera With Footnotes You know what never lies?A calendar. Federal court cases love two things: dates and who had authority on those dates. So here’s your Superior PD Promotion & Retirement Decoder Ring—built for anyone tired of “We take this seriously” while your tax bill quietly weeps. How to Use This Ring When a complaint says any of this, grab the
FEDERAL COURT : LeRette Duty Return – DA Fruehauf Warning
Email Shows Officer LeRette Returned To Duty This email thread dates from November 18–19, 2024. It centers on Officer LeRette’s return from administrative leave. Douglas County District Attorney Mark Fruehauf asked City of Superior officials for an update on the internal process involving LeRette. He wrote that he had heard she was restored to active duty. He also stated his understanding that the internal process
FEDERAL COURT – Superior’s 50k OIR Report Clears Pope in LeRette Claims ?
OIR Group report reveals misconduct claims against Superior PD’s Michelle Pope, detailing allegations of discrimination and investigative findings.
FEDERAL COURT – Union Letter Accuses City of Blocking Grievance
Union disputes city grievance handling, demanding timely responses and accountability in a labor dispute. Taxpayer interests at stake.
