The Landfill Closure Wasn’t a Surprise Party
Back in 2019, a city-commissioned organizational study flat-out warned the landfill was headed for a closing.
It said:
“The City’s landfill is projected to close in 2025.”
And it didn’t stop there. It basically screamed: start planning now—contracts, staffing, and the entire post-landfill reality.
“The City should begin the planning process for the closing of the landfill, the contract negotiations and the elimination of the positions currently working at the landfill.”
That’s 2019. That’s not ancient history. That’s “Stranger Things Season 3 was new” history.
Fast Forward: Leaders Are Touring the Dump Like It’s Disney World
Now we’ve got current headlines about Superior officials starting discussions and fact-finding like they just discovered garbage exists.
Meanwhile, the landfill clock is still ticking. And every day you stall is another day the future gets more expensive.
Why “We’ll Deal With It Later” Always Bills You Twice
The newest reporting lays out the ugly math:
A city-owned transfer station is estimated at $117–$120 per ton.
Using WLSSD’s transfer station is estimated at $88–$92 per ton.
So delaying decisions doesn’t keep costs down. It keeps you stuck paying whatever the market feels like charging that week—like Ticketmaster, but for trash.
And because Superior’s collection fee is designed to cover collection and disposal costs, when disposal costs jump, the fee pressure jumps too.
The 2019 Report Basically Predicted This Mess
That 2019 study didn’t just mention closure. It warned closure requires “significant pre-planning”—including lining up the transfer contract and managing the staffing fallout.
It even flagged the risk of employees bailing once they know their jobs are going away:
Employees may leave “prior to the close.”
Translation: if you wait too long, you don’t just lose time—you lose people, leverage, and continuity. Then you pay consultants and overtime to patch the hole. Classic government two-step.
So Why Didn’t Superior Citizens Get More Years Out of The Dump?
Superior’s landfill capacity is like a pizza. If you invite the whole region to dinner, don’t act shocked when there’s wners who bought the damn pizza.
For years, regional arrangements sent waste through Superior—because it was convenient and because deals get made. The landfill agreement discussions and extensions show how regional waste flows and contracts shape Superior’s timeline.
Inference (but a very reasonable one): letting outside tonnage use Superior’s landfill can bring revenue or regional cooperation benefits, but it also burns through local capacity faster—meaning residents lose years they could’ve had if access stayed tighter.
If the city chose revenue/relationships over preserving lifespan, that’s not “planning.” That’s selling tomorrow to cover today.
Where Mayor Jim Paine and the Council Come In
Mayor Jim Paine and the council don’t get to play innocent bystanders when the 2019 report literally told the city to start planning the closure and contracts years in advance.
Taxpayers should be asking, loudly:
Why did we get “projected to close” in 2019… and “just starting discussions” now?
Why are we still weighing options when per-ton costs are already staring us in the face?
Why did residents not get a clear, transparent “lifespan vs. access” tradeoff debate before capacity got chewed up?
Because once the landfill hits capacity, the city doesn’t negotiate from strength. It negotiates from panic.
And panic is always billed.
Delaying the landfill decision is like refusing to fix your brakes because the car still stops “most of the time.”
Sure—until it doesn’t.
Then you don’t just pay for brakes. You pay for the fence, the lawsuit, and the apology tour.
Mic drop.
Source :
Disclaimer
This article is commentary based on public reporting and a City-commissioned 2019 study. It draws reasonable inferences where direct documentation is not provided, and readers should review original sources for full context. No allegation of wrongdoing is stated as fact without supporting evidence. Teachers keep showing up to nurture kids while administrators angle for raises; city employees keep the place running while leadership debates the optics. Taxpayers deserve straight answers, real timelines, and decisions made before the bill explodes.
2019 RW Report Told Us the Dump Was Dying—So Why Act Shocked in 2026 ?
Superior’s landfill is nearing closure, yet decisions are stalled. Delaying costs more—residents deserve transparency and timely planning.
FOIA DOCS – Superior Police Chief Meets Reporter on Feb. 28 Traffic Stop (March 2024)
This document is a two-page email exchange dated March 29, 2024, filed as Exhibit 27-9 in Cuypers v. Taylor et al., Case No. 3:24-cv-00743. The correspondence documents communication between Paul Winterscheidt, Chief of Police for the City of Superior, and Maria Lockwood, a reporter with the Superior Telegram, regarding a police traffic stop that occurred on February 28, 2024. The exchange begins with Reporter Maria
FOIA DOC – Superior Police Chief Explains Taser Use to City Council (April 2024)
This document is a three-page email chain dated April 3–5, 2024, later filed as Exhibit 27-10 in Cuypers v. Taylor et al., Case No. 3:24-cv-00743. The correspondence centers on public concerns raised about a Superior Police Department traffic stop that resulted in the use of a conducted energy weapon (Taser) and a resisting charge against Ian Richard Cuypers. The email exchange involves Tylor Elm, a
Superior Sgt’s Federal Deposition – Countless Training Hours. Countless ‘I Don’t Recall.
SOUPNUTZ EXCLUSIVE: THE DEPOSITION THAT SAID THE QUIET PART OUT LOUD You ever read something and think, “Wow. That’s either confidence… or denial”? Sergeant Matthew Brown’s September 24, 2025 deposition in Cuypers v. Taylor isn’t a Hollywood script. It’s 64 pages of federal court testimony. And it reads like a masterclass in selective memory. (See Brown Deposition filed Nov. 14, 2025 ) “Countless Hours of
Why Superior’s Malicious Prosecution Could Cost Taxpayers Millions
The Fourth Amendment Does Not Ban Looking Around Even In Superior Here’s what the federal complaint lays out. Ian Cuypers made a wrong turn down a one-way street while delivering DoorDash. That’s a traffic ticket. According to the complaint, multiple officers arrived, drew firearms, and pointed them at him despite no basis to believe he was armed or dangerous. He exited the vehicle. He backed
